Features of the Dependence of the Retention Indices of Sorbates in Reversed-Phase High-Performance Liquid Chromatography on the Content of Organic Solvents in the Eluent

Capa

Citar

Texto integral

Acesso aberto Acesso aberto
Acesso é fechado Acesso está concedido
Acesso é fechado Somente assinantes

Resumo

Characterizing the dependence of the retention indices (RIs) of sorbates of different chemical origins on the content (С) of organic solvents (methanol, acetonitrile) in eluents used in reversed-phase HPLC shows that the coefficients dRI/dC of the same compounds for eluents of different compositions differ considerably. The range of variations in coefficients dRI/dC for water–methanol eluents (–5.6 to +4.6) is approximately twice that of water–acetonitrile eluents (−4.5 to +0.8). It is also found that for nonpolar compounds when using water–acetonitrile eluents, the dRI/dC values are typically lower than those for water–methanol eluents. The opposite is observed for polar compounds. The signs and absolute values of coefficients dRI/dC are largely determined by the polarity of the sorbates. dRI/dC > 0 for nonpolar sorbates, and dRI/dC < 0 for sorbates of higher polarity. Determination even of the sign of this coefficient therefore provides important information about the chemical nature of sorbates. It is shown that coefficients dRI/dC do not correlate with either the RI values or hydrophobicity logPlog⁡. However, they do correlate with homologous increments of hydrophobicity ilogP and the homologous increments of RI iRI for eluents of any composition. Quantities ilogP and iRI characterize the polarity of homologous series of sorbates, rather than the polarity of the particular sorbates.

Sobre autores

I. Zenkevich

Institute of Chemistry, St. Petersburg State University

Email: izenkevich@yandex.ru
198504, St. Petersburg, Russia

A. Deruish

Institute of Chemistry, St. Petersburg State University

Email: izenkevich@yandex.ru
198504, St. Petersburg, Russia

D. Nikitina

Institute of Chemistry, St. Petersburg State University

Autor responsável pela correspondência
Email: izenkevich@yandex.ru
198504, St. Petersburg, Russia

Bibliografia

  1. Kovats’ Retention Index System. In Encyclopedia of Chromatography. Ed. J. Cazes. 3rd Edn. Boca Raton, CRC Press (Taylor & Francis Group). 2010. P. 1304.
  2. Зенкевич И.Г., Ивлева Е.С. // Журн. аналит. химии. 2011. Т. 66. № 1. С. 47. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1061934811010175
  3. Zenkevich I.G., Ukolova E.S. // J. Chromatogr. A. 2012. V. 1265. P. 133. doi: . chroma.2012.09.076.https://doi.org/10.1016/j
  4. Головня Р.В., Арсеньев Ю.Н. // Успехи химии. 1973. Т. 42. № 12. С. 2221.
  5. Mitra G.D., Saha N.C. // Chromatographia. 1973. V. 6. P. 93.
  6. Bangjie C., Shaoyi P. // Ibid. 1988. V. 25. P. 731.
  7. Smith R.M. // J. Chromatogr. A. 1982. V. 236. P. 313. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9673(00)84880-3
  8. Smith R.M., Finn N. // Ibid. 1991. V. 537. P. 51. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9673(01)88885-3
  9. Smith R.M. Retention and Selectivity in Liquid Chromatography / Ed. R.M. Smith. J. of Chromatography Library. 1995. V. 57. P. 93.
  10. Zenkevich I.G., Kochetova M.V., Larionov O.G. et al. // J. Liquid Chromatogr. & Related Technol. 2005. V. 28. P. 2141. https://doi.org/10.1081/JLC-200064000
  11. Smith R.M. Retention indices in reversed-phase HPLC. Advances in chromatography / Eds: J.C. Giddings, E. Grushka. Boca-Raton: CRC Press. 2021. P. 277–319. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003209027.
  12. Zenkevich I.G., Derouiche A., Nikitina D.A. // J. Liquid Chromatogr. Related Technol. 2021. V. 44. № 11. P. 588–598. https://doi.org/10.1080/10826076.2021.1998905
  13. Peterson M.L., Hirsch J. // J. Lipid Res. 1959. V. 1. P. 132.
  14. Курбатова С.В., Сайфутдинов Б.Р. // Журн. физ. химии. 2009. Т. 83. № 7. С. 1377. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0036024409070322
  15. Сайфутдинов Б.Р. // Изв. РАН. Сер. хим. 2014. № 12. С. 2609. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11172-014-0787-0
  16. Сайфутдинов Б.Р. // Физикохимия поверхности и защита материалов. 2016. Т. 52. № 6. С. 586. https://doi.org/10.1134/S2070205116060162
  17. Сайфутдинов Б.Р., Буряк А.К. // Коллоидн. журн. 2019. Т. 81. № 5. С. 605. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1061933X19050107
  18. Зенкевич И.Г., Деруиш А. // Аналитика и контроль. 2022. Т. 26. № 1. С. 41. https://doi.org/10.15826/analitika.2022.26.1.004
  19. Зенкевич И.Г., Никитина Д.А., Корнилова Т.А. // Журн. физ. химии. 2021. Т. 95. № 9. С. 1414. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0036024421090326
  20. Hanai T. // J. Chromatogr. A. 1991. V. 550. P. 313. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9673(01)88547-2
  21. Lochmuller C.H., Hui M. // J. Chromatogr. Sci. 1998. V. 36. P. 11.
  22. Hanai T., Koizumi K., Kinoshita T. // J. Liquid Chromatogr. & Related Technol. 2000. V. 23. № 3. P. 363. https://doi.org/10.1081/JLC-100101457
  23. Henchoz Y., Guillarme D., Martel S. et al.// Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2009/ V. 394. P. 1919. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-009-2862-1
  24. Liang C., Qiao J.-Q., Lian H.-Z. // J. Chromatogr. A. 2017. V. 1528. P. 25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2017.10.064
  25. Зенкевич И.Г., Никитина Д.А., Кушакова А.С. // Журн. аналит. химии. 2022. Т. 77. № 11. С. 1016. https://doi.org/10.31857/s0044450222090146
  26. Katritzky A.R., Fara D.C., Yang H.-E. et al.// Chem. Rev. 2004. V. 104. P. 175. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr020750m
  27. Heberger K., Zenkevich I.G. // J. Chromatogr. A. 2010. V. 1217. P. 2895. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2010.02.037
  28. Зенкевич И.Г., Иоффе Б.В. Интерпретация масс-спектров органических соединений. Л.: Химия, 1986. 176 с.
  29. Atovmyan E.G., Aldoshin S.M., Atovmyan L.O. // Molecular Cryst. Liquid Cryst. Nonlinear Optics. 1990. V. 178. P. 231. https://doi.org/10.1080/00268949008042721
  30. Зенкевич И.Г. // Журн. общ. химии. 2019. Т. 89. № 3. С. 331–341. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1070363219030010

Arquivos suplementares

Arquivos suplementares
Ação
1. JATS XML
2.

Baixar (46KB)
3.

Baixar (38KB)
4.

Baixar (15KB)
5.

Baixar (8KB)
6.

Baixar (40KB)
7.

Baixar (24KB)

Declaração de direitos autorais © И.Г. Зенкевич, А. Деруиш, Д.А. Никитина, 2023