I.P. Pavlov Journal of Higher Nervous ActivityI.P. Pavlov Journal of Higher Nervous ActivityЖурнал высшей нервной деятельности им. И.П. Павлова0044-46773034-5316The Russian Academy of Sciences65207610.31857/S0044467724040012ОБЗОРЫ И ТЕОРЕТИЧЕСКИЕ СТАТЬИReview ArticleEvent-related potentials in studies of the implicit component of cognitive biasesОбзор опыта использования потенциалов, связанных с событием, в исследованиях имплицитного компонента когнитивных искаженийYatsenkoM. V.ЯценкоМ. В.
Russian Federation
edartemenko@hse.ruBrakI. V.БракИ. В.
Russian Federation
edartemenko@hse.ruArtemenkoE. D.АртеменкоЕ. Д.
Russian Federation
edartemenko@hse.ruHSE UniversityНациональный исследовательский университет «Высшая школа экономики»Altai State UniversityАлтайский государственный университетNovosibirsk State UniversityНовосибирский национальный исследовательский государственный университет0911202474438539502022025Copyright ©; 2024, Russian Academy of SciencesCopyright ©; 2024, Российская академия наук2024Russian Academy of SciencesРоссийская академия наукhttps://innoscience.ru/0044-4677/article/view/652076

The review analyzes neurophysiological correlates of the implicit component of cognitive bias in the processes of perception and decision-making. The review identifies the leading methodological pipeline for analysis of the implicit component of cognitive bias, and justifies its choice in terms of the objectives of this review. The method of recording event-related potentials (ERPs) was chosen as the main approach to determining neurophysiological indicators of implicit processes. The analysis of literature allowed us to identify ERP components reproduced in the works of different authors using different variants of experimental designs for studying implicit bias, which may indicate the presence of common neurophysiological mechanisms associated with implicit processes in cognitive bias. The possibility of using other approaches to the analysis of EEG data to obtain new information about the mechanisms of implicit components in cognitive bias is also discussed.

В настоящем обзоре рассматриваются нейрофизиологические корреляты имплицитного компонента когнитивных искажений в процессах восприятия и принятия решений. В обзоре определен ведущий методический алгоритм для анализа имплицитного компонента когнитивных искажений, обоснован его выбор с точки зрения целей данного обзора. В качестве основного подхода к определению нейрофизиологических показателей имплицитных процессов выбран метод регистрации потенциалов, связанных с событием (ВП). Анализ литературных данных позволил выявить компоненты ВП, воспроизводимые в работах разных авторов в исследованиях различных вариантов неявной предвзятости при восприятии и принятии решений у человека, что может свидетельствовать о наличии общих нейрофизиологических механизмов, связанных с имплицитными процессами предвзятости при когнитивных искажениях. В обзоре также обсуждаются перспективы использования других подходов к анализу данных ЭЭГ для получения новой информации о феномене неявной предвзятости при принятии решений.

cognitive biasimplicit componentevent-related potentialsERPImplicit Association TestIATкогнитивные искаженияимплицитный компонентпотенциалысвязанные с событиямиВПтест имплицитных ассоциацийIATРоссийский научный фондRussian Science Foundation23-78-10035Боброва Л.А. Когнитивные искажения. Социальные и гуманитарные науки. Отечественная и зарубежная литература. Серия 3, Философия: Реферативный журнал. 2021. (2): 69–79.Канеман Д. Думай медленно… решай быстро. М.: АСТ, 2016. 653 с.Осин Е.Н. Измерение позитивных и негативных эмоций: разработка русскоязычного аналога методики PANAS. Психология. Журнал Высшей школы экономики. 2012. 9 (4): 91–110.Aldayel M., Ykhlef M., Al-Nafjan A. Recognition of Consumer Preference by Analysis and Classification EEG Signals. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2021. 14: 604639. https://doi.org/0.3389/fnhum.2020.604639Anzures G., Mildort M. Do perceptual expertise and implicit racial bias predict early face-sensitive ERP responses? Brain Cogn. 2021. 147: 105671. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2020.105671Barsade S.G., Ramarajan L., Westen D. Implicit affect in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior. 2009. 29: 135–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2009.06.008Bhat D., Kollu T., Ricci J.A., Patel A. What’s in a Name? Implicit Bias Affects Patient Perception of Surgeon Skill. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2021. 147 (6): 948–956. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000008171Bosshard S.S., Bourke J.D., Kunaharan S., Koller M., Walla P., Heinonen J. Established liked versus disliked brands: Brain activity, implicit associations and explicit responses. Cogent Psychology. 2016. 3:1. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311908.2016.1176691Camsari D.D., Lewis C.P., Sonmez A.I., Ozger C., Fatih P., Yuruk D., Shekunov J., Vande Voort J.L., Croarkin P.E. Event-Related Potential Markers of Suicidality in Adolescents. Int. J. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2023. 26 (8): 566–575. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijnp/pyad039Cai H., Wu L. The self-esteem implicit association test is valid: Evidence from brain activity. Psych J. 2021 Jun;10(3):465-477. doi: 10.1002/pchj.422. Epub 2021 Jan 28. PMID: 33511787.Chaiyanan C., Iramina K., Kaewkamnerdpong B. Investigation on Identifying Implicit Learning Event from EEG Signal Using Multiscale Entropy and Artificial Bee Colony. Entropy. 2021. 23 (5): 617. https://doi.org/10.3390/e23050617Chen L., Zhou H., Gu Y., Wang S., Wang J., Tian L., Zhu H., Zhou Z. The Neural Correlates of Implicit Cognitive Bias Toward Internet-Related Cues in Internet Addiction: An ERP Study. Front. Psychiatry. 2018. 9: 421. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00421.Cui Y., Engelmann J.M., Gilbert D.G., Waters A.J., Cinciripini P.M., Robinson J.D. The impact of nicotine dose and instructed dose on smokers’ implicit attitudes to smoking cues: An ERP study. Psychol Addict Behav. 2019. 33(8): 710–720. https://doi.org/10.1037/adb0000523Greenwald A.G., McGhee D.E., Schwartz J.L. Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: the implicit association test. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 1998. 74 (6): 1464-80. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.74.6.1464.Greenwald A.G., Poehlman T.A., Uhlmann E.L., Banaji M.R. Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: III. Meta-analysis of predictive validity. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2009. 97 (1): 17–41. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015575Healy G.F., Boran L., Smeaton A.F. Neural Patterns of the Implicit Association Test. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2015. 9: 605. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00605Hilgard J., Bartholow B.D., Dickter C.L., Blanton H. Characterizing switching and congruency effects in the Implicit Association Test as reactive and proactive cognitive control. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience. 2015. 10 (3): 381–388. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsu060Howell J.L., Gasser M.L., Kaysen D., Lindgren K.P. Understanding parental vaccine refusal: Implicit and explicit associations about vaccines as potential building blocks of vaccine beliefs and behavior. Social Science & Medicine. 2022. 310: 115275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115275Lahtinen A., Juvonen K., Lapveteläinen A., Kolehmainen M., Lindholm M., Tanila H., Kantanen T., Sinikallio S., Karhunen L., Närväinen J. Metabolic state as a modulator of neural event-related potentials for food stimuli in an implicit association test. Physiol. Behav. 2019. 209: 112589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2019.112589Le Bouc R., Pessiglione M. A neuro-computational account of procrastination behavior. Nat. Commun. 2022. 13 (1): 5639. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-33119-wLou Y., Lei Y., Astikainen P., Peng W., Otieno S., Leppänen P.H.T. Brain responses of dysphoric and control participants during a self-esteem implicit association test. Psychophysiology. 2021. 58 (4): e13768. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.13768Meissner F., Grigutsch L.A., Koranyi N., Müller F., Rothermund K. Predicting Behavior With Implicit Measures: Disillusioning Findings, Reasonable Explanations, and Sophisticated Solutions. Front. Psychol. 2019. 10: 2483. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02483Nosek B.A., Hawkins C.B., Frazier R.S. Implicit social cognition: from measures to mechanisms. Trends Cogn Sci. 2011. 15 (4): 152–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2011.01.005Pesciarelli F., Leo I., Serafini L. Electrophysiological correlates of unconscious processes of race. Sci Rep. 2021. 11: 11646. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-91133-2Peters U. What is the function of confirmation bias? Erkenntnis, 2022. 87 (3): 1351–1376. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-020-00252-1Qian Y., Xiaoyun L., Weiwei P. Individual Variation in Pain Sensitivity and Implicit Negative Bias Toward Pain. Psychosomatic Medicine. 2020. 82 (8): 796–804. https://doi.org/10.1097/PSY.0000000000000844Portengen C.M., Huffmeijer R., van Baar A.L., Endendijk J.J. Measuring the neural correlates of the violation of social expectations: A comparison of two experimental tasks. Social Neuroscience. 2022. 17 (1): 58–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470919.2022.2032327Quirin M., Kazén M., Kuhl J. When nonsense sounds happy or helpless: The Implicit Positive and Negative Affect Test (IPANAT). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2009. 97: 500–516. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016063Schiller B., Gianotti L.R., Baumgartner T., Nash K., Koenig T., Knoch D. Clocking the social mind by identifying mental processes in the IAT with electrical neuroimaging. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2016. 113 (10): 2786–2791. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1515828113Schiller B., Sperl M.F.J., Kleinert T., Nash K., Gianotti L.R.R. EEG Microstates in Social and Affective Neuroscience. Brain Topogr. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10548-023-00987-4Shah H.S., Bohlen J. Implicit Bias. 2023 Mar 4. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing, 2024.Simione L., Vagni M., Maiorano T., Giostra V., Pajardi D. How Implicit Attitudes toward Vaccination Affect Vaccine Hesitancy and Behaviour: Developing and Validating the V-IRAP. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2022. 19: 4205. https://doi.org/10.3390/ ijerph19074205Tao D., Leng Y., Peng S., Xu J., Ge S., Deng H. Temporal dynamics of explicit and implicit moral evaluations. International Journal of Psychophysiology. 2022. 172: 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2021.12.006Tschuemperlin R.M., Batschelet H.M., Moggi F., Koenig T., Roesner S., Keller A., Pfeifer P., Soravia L.M., Stein M. The Neurophysiology of Implicit Alcohol Associations in Recently Abstinent Patients With Alcohol Use Disorder: An Event-Related Potential Study Considering Gender Effects. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2020. 44(10): 2031–2044. https://doi.org/10.1111/acer.14444van Nunspeet F., Ellemers N., Derks B., Nieuwenhuis S. Moral concerns increase attention and response monitoring during IAT performance: ERP evidence. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience. 2014. 9 (2): 141–149.Wagner-Altendorf T.A., van der Lugt A.H., Kroeber A., Cirkel A., Heldmann M., Münte T.F. Differences in Implicit Attitudes in West and East Germans as Measured by the Go/NoGo Association Task and Event-related EEG Potentials. Cognitive and Behavioral Neurology. 2023. 36 (3): 145–158. https://doi.org/10.1097/WNN.0000000000000338Wang Y, Li X. Temporal course of implicit emotion regulation during a Priming-Identify task: an ERP study. Sci Rep. 2017. 2(7): 41941. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep41941Williams J.K., Themanson J.R. Neural correlates of the implicit association test: evidence for semantic and emotional processing. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience. 2011. 6 (4): 468–476. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsq065