Space weather monitoring with a system of ground-based cosmic ray detectors

封面

如何引用文章

全文:

开放存取 开放存取
受限制的访问 ##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问 订阅存取

详细

For remote identification of the processes of powerful solar activity in the form of CME directed towards the Earth, a technique of flicker noise spectroscopy has been developed. The results of the analysis of geo-effective events (> G1) are presented according to the data of the international network of neutron monitors and the multidirectional muon hodoscope URAGAN, which indicate the appearance of predictors (with an outstrip of 1–2 days) of the CME approach to the Earthʼs orbit.

全文:

受限制的访问

作者简介

V. Borog

MEPhI (Moscow Engineering Physics Institute) National Research Nuclear University

编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: vvborog@mephi.ru
俄罗斯联邦, Moscow

A. Dmitrieva

MEPhI (Moscow Engineering Physics Institute) National Research Nuclear University

Email: vvborog@mephi.ru
俄罗斯联邦, Moscow

Yu. Mishutina

MEPhI (Moscow Engineering Physics Institute) National Research Nuclear University

Email: vvborog@mephi.ru
俄罗斯联邦, Moscow

参考

  1. Shen F., Shen C., Xu M. et al. // Rev. Mod. Plasma Phys. 2022. V. 6. P. 8.
  2. Tlatov A.G., Abramov-Maximo V.E., Borovik V.N. et al. // Geomagn. Aeronomy. 2018. V. 58. P. 1087.
  3. Фридман В.М., Шейнер О.А., Тихомиров Ю.В. // Изв. РАН. Сер. физ. 2006. Т. 70. № 10. С. 1487; Fridman V.M., Sheiner O.A., Tikhomirov Yu.V. // Bull. Russ. Acad. Sci. Phys. 2006. V. 70. No. 10. P. 1703.
  4. Слемзин В.А., Горяев Ф.Ф., Родькин Д.Г. и др. // Физика плазмы. 2019. Т. 45. № 10. С. 1; Slemzin V.A., Goryaev F.F., D.G. Rodkin D.G. et al. // Plasma Phys. Report. 2019. V. 83. P. 889.
  5. Астапов И.И., Ампилогов Н.В., Барбашина Н.С. и др. // Тр. XVI Всеросс. конф. по солнечн. физике (Санкт-Петербург, 2012). С. 423.
  6. Григорьев В.Г., Стародубцев С.А., Гололобов П.Ю. // Изв. РАН. Сер. физ. 2017. Т. 81. № 2. С. 219; Grigoryev V.G., Starodubtsev S.A., Gololobov P.Y. // Bull. Russ. Acad. Sci. Phys. 2017. V. 81. No. 2. P. 200.
  7. Яшин И.И., Астапов И.И., Барбашина Н.С. и др. // Изв. РАН. Сер. физ. 2019. Т. 83. № 5. С. 631; Yashin I.I., Astapov I.I., Barbashina N.S. et al. // Bull. Russ. Acad. Sci. Phys. 2019. V. 83. No. 5. P. 572.
  8. Тимашев С.Ф. Фликкер-шумовая спектроскопия: информация в хаотических сигналах. М.: Физматлит, 2007. 248 с.
  9. Борог В.В., Ампилогов Н.В., Дмитриева А.Н. и др. // Изв. РАН. Сер. физ. 2017. Т. 81. № 2. С. 216; Borog V.V., Ampilogov N.V., Dmitrieva A.N. et al. // Bull. Russ. Acad. Sci. Phys. 2017. V 81. No. 2. P. 197.
  10. https://www01.nmdb.eu.
  11. https://www.spaceweatherlive.com/en/auroral-activity/top-50-geomagnetic-storms.html.

补充文件

附件文件
动作
1. JATS XML
下载
2. Fig. 1. Analysis of the event 14.06.2008. Total series of the nonstationarity factor C(t) for NMs of different continents (units): for European (LMKS, MOSC) (a), Asian (AATB, NANM) (b), American (MXCO, CALG) (c), sum for all NMs (d), Kp index values (e). Data (a, b, c) are shown for the 08-14 June interval as predictors. Data (d) correspond to the appearance of ‘spikes’ after the predictor (15-17 June) during the forebush effect. The abscissa axis is the time interval 08-18 June 2008

下载 (317KB)
索引源数据
3. Fig. 2. Analysis of the event 04.11.2021: the C(t) sum of seven NM series (CALM, JUNG1, LMKS, AATB, YKTK, MXCO, NEWK) (a), C(t) series for the sum and product of the three ‘ring’ series of the URAGAN yearscope (units) (b, c). Data (a, b, c) are shown for the interval 28 October - 03 November as predictors. Data (d, e, f) correspond to the appearance of ‘spikes’ after the 03-05 November predictor during the forebush effect. The abscissa axis is the time interval 28 October - 05 November 2021

下载 (404KB)
索引源数据

版权所有 © Russian Academy of Sciences, 2024