The role and place of telemedicine technologies in the rehabilitation of stroke patients in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Rehabilitation of patients after acute cerebrovascular accident (ACVA) is one of the most pressing problems in modern medicine. Timely and continuous rehabilitation support of the patient at all stages of treatment is an essential factor for social, everyday life and occupational adaptation. Involving family members in the recovery process, training the skills and rules for setting goals are also essential components of successful rehabilitation. The wide spreading and implementation of telemedicine technologies can play a leading role in achieving these goals. Based on the data of domestic and foreign literature, the current trends in the rehabilitation of stroke patients with the use of telemedicine technologies were determined. The effectiveness of telemedicine rehabilitation was assessed based on the analysis of various studies and personal experience, and the possibility of using such remote methods and approaches after the COVID-19 pandemic was considered.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

I. P Parfenov

City Clinical Hospital n.a. V.V. Veresaev

Moscow, Russia

R. V Shirokiy

City Clinical Hospital n.a. V.V. Veresaev

Moscow, Russia

Vladimir S. Fomin

City Clinical Hospital n.a. V.V. Veresaev

Email: wlfomin83@gmail.com
Cand. Sci. (Med.), Associate Professor, surgeon Moscow, Russia

References

  1. Mitchell M., Kan L. Digital Technology and the Future of Health Systems. Health Systems & Reform, 2019;5(2):113-20. doi: 10.1080/23288604.2019.1583040
  2. Mechanic O.J., Persaud Y., Kimball A.B. Telehealth Systems. 2020 Sep 18. In: StatPearls [Internet] Systems & Reform, 2019;5(2):113-20. doi: 10.1080/23288604.2019.1583040.
  3. SAGES Group. Guidelines for the surgical practice of telemedicine. Society of American Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Surgeons. Surg Endosc. 2000;14(10):975-79.
  4. Evans C.R., Medina M.G., Dwyer A.M. Telemedicine and telerobotics: from science fiction to reality. Updates Surg. 2018;70(3):357-62. Doi: 10.1007/ s13304-018-0574-9.
  5. Barold S.S. Willem Einthoven and the birth of clinical electrocardiography a hundred. years ago. Card Electrophysiol Rev. 2003;7(1):99-104. doi: 10.1023/a:1023667812925.
  6. Eadie L.H., Seifalian A.M., Davidson B.R. Telemedicine in surgery. Br J Surg. 2003;90(6):647-58. doi: 10.1002/bjs.4168.
  7. Augestad K.M., Lindsetmo R.-O. Overcoming distance: videoconferencing as a clinical and educational tool among surgeons. World J Surg. 2009;33:1356-65. doi: 10.1007/s00268-009-0036-0.
  8. Santomauro M., Reina G.A., Stroup S.P., L'Esperance J.O. Telementoring in robotic surgery. Curr Opin Urol. 2013;23(2):141-45. Doi: 10.1097/ MOU.0b013e32835d4cc2.
  9. Владзимирский А.В. История телемедицины: Curatio Sine Tempora et Distantia. М., 2014. 416 с.
  10. Вишневский А.А. Дневник хирурга: Великая Отечественная война 1941-1945 гг. 2-e изд. М., 1970. 424 с
  11. Шепель Р.Н., Кутчер А.В., Ваховская Т.В., Драпкина О.М. История развития телемедицины в Российской Федерации. Неотложная кардиология и кардиооваскулярные риски. 2019;3(2):765-71
  12. Владзимирский А.В. Телемедицина: Curatio Sine Tempora et Distantia. М., 2016. 663 с
  13. Brennan D., Mawson S., Brownsell S. Telerehabilitation: enabling the remote delivery of healthcare, rehabilitation and self management. In: Gaggioli A editor(s). Advanced Technologies in Rehabilitation. Amsterdam: IOS Press, 2009. Р 231-48.
  14. Laver K.E., Adey-Wakeling Z., Crotty M., et al. Telerehabilitation services for stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020;1:CD010255. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010255.pub3.
  15. Russell T. Telerehabilitation: a coming of age. Austral J Physiother. 2009;55:5-6.
  16. Weiss P., Kizony R., Feintuch U., Katz N. Virtual reality in neurorehabilitation. In: Selzer M, Cohen L, Gage F, Clarke S, Duncan P editor(s). Textbook of Neural Repair and Rehabilitation. Cambridge University Press, 2006. Р. 182-97.
  17. Lintern G., Roscoe S., Koonce J., Segal L. Display principles, control dynamics and environmental factors in pilot training and transfer. Human Factors 1990;32:299-317.
  18. Larsen C., Sorensen J., Grantcharov T., et al. Effect of virtual reality training on laparoscopic surgery: randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2009;338:b1802. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b1802.
  19. Jiandani N., Nair S.R., Shukla H. Efficacy of virtual reality exposure therapy in the management of symptoms associated with post traumatic stress disorder. Value in Health 2014;17(7):A572. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2014.08.1918.
  20. Raghav K., Van Wijk A.J., Abdullah F., et al. Efficacy of virtual reality exposure therapy for treatment of dental phobia: a randomized control trial. BMC. Oral Health. 2016;16(25). doi: 10.1186/s12903-016-0186-z.
  21. Langhorne P., Bernhardt J., Kwakkel G. Stroke rehabilitation. Lancet. 2011;377(9778):1693-702. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60325-5.
  22. Veerbeek J.M., Van Wegen E., Van Peppen R., et al. What is the evidence for physical therapy poststroke? A systematic review and metaanalysis. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(2):e87987. doi: 10.1371/journal. pone.0087987.
  23. Piron L., Turolla A., Agostini M., et al. Exercises for paretic upper limb after stroke: a combined virtualreality and telemedicine approach. J Rehabilit Med. 2009;41:1016-20. doi: 10.2340/165019770459.
  24. Lennon S., Ashburn A. The Bobath concept in stroke rehabilitation: a focus group study of the experienced physiotherapists' perspective. Disabil Rehabil. 2000;22:665-74. doi: 10.1080/096382800445461.
  25. Seo K.C., Kim H.A: The effects of ramp gat exercise with PNF on stroke patients' dynamic balance. J Phys Ther Sci. 2015;27:1747-49. Doi: 10.1589/ jpts.27.1747.
  26. de Kroon J.R., Ijzerman M.J., Chae J., et al: Relation between stimulation characteristics and clinical outcome in studies using electrical stimulation to improve motor control of the upper extremity in stroke. J Rehabil Med. 2005;37:65-74. doi: 10.1080/16501970410024190.
  27. Chen J., Jin W., Dong W.S., et al. Effects of home-based telesupervising rehabilitation on physical function for stroke survivors with hemiplegia. Am J Phys Med Rehabilit. 2017;96(3):152-60. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000000559.
  28. Boter H. HESTIA Study Group. Multicenter randomized controlled trial of an outreach nursing support program for recently discharged stroke patients. Stroke. 2004;35:2867-72. doi: 10.1161/01. STR.0000147717.57531.e5.
  29. Bishop D., Miller I., Weiner D., et al. Family Intervention: Telephone Tracking (FITT): a pilot stroke outcome study. Topics in Stroke Rehabilit. 2014;21(Suppl.:S63-74. doi: 10.1310/tsr21S1-S63.
  30. Cramer S.C., Dodakian L., Le V., et al. Efficacy of home-based telerehabilitation vs in-clinic therapy for adults after stroke: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. Neurol. 2019;76(9):1079-87. Doi: 10.1001/ jamaneurol.2019.1604.
  31. Piron L., Turolla A., Tonin P., et al. Satisfaction with care in post-stroke patients undergoing a telerehabilitation programme at home. J Telemed Telecare. 2008;14:257-60. doi: 10.1258/jtt.2008.080304.
  32. В России запустили госсервис телемедицины. ТАСС

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Copyright (c) 2021 Bionika Media

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies