<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="review-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Science and Innovations in Medicine</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">Science and Innovations in Medicine</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Наука и инновации в медицине</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">2500-1388</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">2618-754X</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">FSBEI of Higher Education SamSMU of Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">21528</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.35693/2500-1388-2016-0-3-11-27</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>Статьи</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject>Review Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">BRAIN-COMPUTER INTERFACE FOR THE AUGMENTATION OF BRAIN FUNCTIONS</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>НЕЙРОКОМПЬЮТЕРНЫЕ ИНТЕРФЕЙСЫ ДЛЯ РАСШИРЕНИЯ ФУНКЦИЙ МОЗГА</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Lebedev</surname><given-names>M A</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Лебедев</surname><given-names>М А</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio><p>PhD (Physics and Mathematics), Senior Research Scientist, Department of Neurobiology, Duke University Medical Center (Durham, North Carolina, USA).</p></bio><email>lebedev@neuro.duke.edu</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Duke University (Durham, North Carolina, USA)</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Университет Дьюка (Дарем, Северная Каролина, США)</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2016-09-15" publication-format="electronic"><day>15</day><month>09</month><year>2016</year></pub-date><volume>1</volume><issue>3</issue><issue-title xml:lang="en">NO3 (2016)</issue-title><issue-title xml:lang="ru">№3 (2016)</issue-title><fpage>11</fpage><lpage>27</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2020-03-10"><day>10</day><month>03</month><year>2020</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement xml:lang="en">Copyright ©; 2016, Lebedev M.A.</copyright-statement><copyright-statement xml:lang="ru">Copyright ©; 2016, Лебедев М.А.</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2016</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Lebedev M.A.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Лебедев М.А.</copyright-holder><ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/"/><license><ali:license_ref xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</ali:license_ref></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://innoscience.ru/2500-1388/article/view/21528">https://innoscience.ru/2500-1388/article/view/21528</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Brain-computer interface (BCI) connects the nervous system departments with external devices for the purpose of recovery of motor and sensory functions of patients with neurological lesions. Over the past half-century BCI have gone from initial ideas to the high-tech modern incarnations. This development contributed significantly to the invasive techniques of multichannel registration activity of neuronal ensembles. Modern BCI are able to manage mechanical prosthetic arms and legs. Furthermore, BCI can provide sensory feedback, allowing the user to feel the movement of the prosthesis and its interaction with external objects. Latest BCI connect multiple users to the brain network. In this review, these achievements are dealt with a focus on invasive BCI.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>Нейрокомпьютерные интерфейсы (НКИ) соединяют отделы нервной системы с внешними устройствами с целью восстановления моторных и сенсорных функций больных с неврологическими поражениями. За последние 50 лет НКИ прошли путь от первоначальных идей до высокотехнологических современных воплощений. Этому развитию в значительной мере способствовали методики многоканальной инвазивной регистрации активности нейронных ансамблей. Современные НКИ способны управлять механическими протезами рук и ног. Более того, НКИ могут обеспечивать сенсорную обратную связь, позволяющую пользователю ощущать движения протеза и его взаимодействие с внешними предметами. Новейшие НКИ соединяют несколько пользователей в мозгосеть. В настоящем обзоре эти достижения разбираются с акцентом на инвазивные НКИ.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>brain-computer interface</kwd><kwd>neural network</kwd><kwd>neural activity</kwd><kwd>neuronal decoding</kwd><kwd>neuroplasticity of the brain</kwd><kwd>EEG</kwd><kwd>functional electrical stimulation</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>нейрокомпьютерный интерфейс</kwd><kwd>нейронная сеть</kwd><kwd>нейрональная активность</kwd><kwd>нейрональное декодирование</kwd><kwd>нейропластичность мозга</kwd><kwd>электроэнцефалограмма</kwd><kwd>функциональная электростимуляция</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><mixed-citation>Ramh y Cajal, S., Histology of the nervous system of man and vertebrates. History of neuroscience. 1995, New York: Oxford University Press</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><mixed-citation>Finger, S., Origins of neuroscience: a history of explorations into brain function. 1994, New York: Oxford University Press. XVIII, 462 p</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><mixed-citation>Adrian, E.D.A., The mechanism of nervous action; electrical studies of the neurone. Pennsylvania University The Eldridge Reeves Johnson foundation lectures 1931. 1932, Philadelphia, London: University of Pennsylvania Press; H. Milford, Oxford University Press. x, 103 p</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><mixed-citation>Shepherd, G.M., Foundations of the neuron doctrine. 25th anniversary edition. ed. 2016, Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press. XXVI, 339 pages</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><mixed-citation>Golgi, C., Sulla fina anatomia degli organi centrali del sistema nervoso. Biblioteca della scienza italiana. 1995, Firenze: Giunti. 264 p</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><mixed-citation>Connors, B.W. and M.A. Long, Electrical synapses in the mammalian brain. Annu Rev Neurosci, 2004. 27: 393-418</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><mixed-citation>Kosaka, T. and K. Hama, Gap junctions between non-pyramidal cell dendrites in the rat hippocampus (CA1 and CA3 regions): a combined Golgi-electron microscopy study. J Comp Neurol, 1985. 231(2):150-61</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><mixed-citation>Sloper, J.J., Gap junctions between dendrites in the primate neocortex. Brain Res, 1972. 44(2): 641-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><mixed-citation>Lewis, T.J. and J. Rinzel, Dynamics of spiking neurons connected by both inhibitory and electrical coupling. J Comput Neurosci, 2003. 14(3): 283-309</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><mixed-citation>Hebb, D.O., The organization of behavior : a neuropsychological theory. 2002, Mahwah, N.J.: L. Erlbaum Associates</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><mixed-citation>Georgopoulos, A.P., A.B. Schwartz, and R.E. Kettner, Neuronal population coding of movement direction. Science, 1986. 233(4771):1416-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><mixed-citation>Georgopoulos, A.P., Population activity in the control of movement. Int Rev Neurobiol, 1994. 37: p. 103-19; discussion 121-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><mixed-citation>Georgopoulos, A.P., R.E. Kettner, and A.B. Schwartz, Primate motor cortex and free arm movements to visual targets in three-dimensional space. II. Coding of the direction of movement by a neuronal population. J Neurosci, 1988. 8(8):2928-37</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><mixed-citation>Nicolelis, M.A., et al., Dynamic and distributed properties of many-neuron ensembles in the ventral posterior medial thalamus of awake rats. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 1993. 90(6): 2212-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><mixed-citation>Nicolelis, M.A., et al., Simultaneous encoding of tactile information by three primate cortical areas. Nat Neurosci, 1998. 1(7): 621-30</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><label>16.</label><mixed-citation>Nicolelis, M.A., et al., Reconstructing the engram: simultaneous, multisite, many single neuron recordings. Neuron, 1997. 18(4):529-37</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><label>17.</label><mixed-citation>Wilson, M.A. and B.L. McNaughton, Reactivation of hippocampal ensemble memories during sleep. Science, 1994. 265(5172): 676-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><label>18.</label><mixed-citation>Wilson, M.A. and B.L. McNaughton, Dynamics of the hippocampal ensemble code for space. Science, 1993. 261(5124): 1055-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><label>19.</label><mixed-citation>Liao, L.D., et al., Gaming control using a wearable and wireless EEG-based brain-computer interface device with novel dry foam-based sensors. J Neuroeng Rehabil, 2012. 9: 5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B20"><label>20.</label><mixed-citation>Akhtar, A., et al., Playing checkers with your mind: an interactive multiplayer hardware game platform for brain-computer interfaces. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc, 2014. 2014:1650-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B21"><label>21.</label><mixed-citation>Martisius, I. and R. Damasevicius, A Prototype SSVEP Based Real Time BCI Gaming System. Comput Intell Neurosci, 2016. 2016: p. 3861425</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B22"><label>22.</label><mixed-citation>Li, J., et al., A competitive brain computer interface: multiperson car racing system. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc, 2013. 2013: 2200-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B23"><label>23.</label><mixed-citation>Sung, Y., K. Cho, and K. Um, A development architecture for serious games using BCI (brain computer interface) sensors. Sensors (Basel), 2012. 12(11): 15671-88</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B24"><label>24.</label><mixed-citation>Hasan, B.A. and J.Q. Gan, Hangman BCI: an unsupervised adaptive self-paced Brain-Computer Interface for playing games. Comput Biol Med, 2012. 42(5):598-606</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B25"><label>25.</label><mixed-citation>Finke, A., A. Lenhardt, and H. Ritter, The MindGame: a P300-based brain-computer interface game. Neural Netw, 2009. 22(9):1329-33</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B26"><label>26.</label><mixed-citation>Yang, L. and H. Leung, An online BCI game based on the decoding of users' attention to color stimulus. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc, 2013. 2013: 5267-70</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B27"><label>27.</label><mixed-citation>Mason, S.G., et al., Real-time control of a video game with a direct brain--computer interface. J Clin Neurophysiol, 2004. 21(6): 404-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B28"><label>28.</label><mixed-citation>Ahn, M., et al., A review of brain-computer interface games and an opinion survey from researchers, developers and users. Sensors (Basel), 2014. 14(8):14601-33</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B29"><label>29.</label><mixed-citation>Garces Correa, A., L. Orosco, and E. Laciar, Automatic detection of drowsiness in EEG records based on multimodal analysis. Med Eng Phys, 2014. 36(2): 244-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B30"><label>30.</label><mixed-citation>Lin, C.T., et al., Development of wireless brain computer interface with embedded multitask scheduling and its application on real-time driver's drowsiness detection and warning. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng, 2008. 55(5): 1582-91</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B31"><label>31.</label><mixed-citation>Sahayadhas, A., K. Sundaraj, and M. Murugappan, Drowsiness detection during different times of day using multiple features. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med, 2013. 36(2): 243-50</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B32"><label>32.</label><mixed-citation>Liu, N.H., C.Y. Chiang, and H.M. Hsu, Improving driver alertness through music selection using a mobile EEG to detect brainwaves. Sensors (Basel), 2013. 13(7): 8199-221</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B33"><label>33.</label><mixed-citation>Picot, A., S. Charbonnier, and A. Caplier, On-line automatic detection of driver drowsiness using a single electroencephalographic channel. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc, 2008. 2008: 3864-7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B34"><label>34.</label><mixed-citation>Tsai, P.Y., et al., A portable device for real time drowsiness detection using novel active dry electrode system. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc, 2009. 2009: 3775-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B35"><label>35.</label><mixed-citation>Chin-Teng, L., et al., A real-time wireless brain-computer interface system for drowsiness detection. IEEE Trans Biomed Circuits Syst, 2010. 4(4): 214-22</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B36"><label>36.</label><mixed-citation>Marchesi, M. and B. Ricc6. BRAVO: a brain virtual operator for education exploiting brain-computer interfaces. in CHI'13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2013. ACM</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B37"><label>37.</label><mixed-citation>Maguire, G.Q. and E.M. McGee, Implantable brain chips? Time for debate. Hastings Center Report, 1999. 29(1):7-13</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B38"><label>38.</label><mixed-citation>McGee, E.M., Bioelectronics and Implanted devices, in Medical enhancement and posthumanity. 2008, Springer: 207-224</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B39"><label>39.</label><mixed-citation>Farah, M.J. and P.R. Wolpe, Monitoring and manipulating brain function: New neuroscience technologies and their ethical implications. Hastings Center Report, 2004. 34(3): 35-45</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B40"><label>40.</label><mixed-citation>Madan, C.R., Augmented memory: a survey of the approaches to remembering more. Frontiers in systems neuroscience, 2014. 8: 30</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B41"><label>41.</label><mixed-citation>Zehr, E.P., Future Think: Cautiously Optimistic About Brain Augmentation Using Tissue Engineering and Machine Interface. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 2015</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B42"><label>42.</label><mixed-citation>Clausen, J., Moving minds: ethical aspects of neural motor prostheses. Biotechnology Journal, 2008. 3(12): 1493-1501</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B43"><label>43.</label><mixed-citation>Kamiya, J., Biofeedback training in voluntary control of EEG alpha rhythms. Calif Med, 1971. 115(3): 44</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B44"><label>44.</label><mixed-citation>Sterman, M.B., Neurophysiologic and clinical studies of sensorimotor EEG biofeedback training: some effects on epilepsy. Semin Psychiatry, 1973. 5(4): 507-25</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B45"><label>45.</label><mixed-citation>Weber, E.S., Autogenic training and EEG biofeedback training in coronary heart disease. J Med Soc N J, 1974. 71(12): 927-31</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B46"><label>46.</label><mixed-citation>Finley, W.W., H.A. Smith, and M.D. Etherton, Reduction of seizures and normalization of the EEG in a severe epileptic following sensorimotor biofeedback training: preliminary study. Biol Psychol, 1975. 2(3): 189-203</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B47"><label>47.</label><mixed-citation>Kaplan, B.J., Biofeedback in epileptics: equivocal relationship of reinforced EEG frequency to seizure reduction. Epilepsia, 1975. 16(3): 477-85</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B48"><label>48.</label><mixed-citation>Woodruff, D.S., Relationships among EEG alpha frequency, reaction time, and age: a biofeedback study. Psychophysiology, 1975. 12(6): 673-81</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B49"><label>49.</label><mixed-citation>Suter, S., Independent biofeedback self-regulation of EEG alpha and skin resistance. Biofeedback Self Regul, 1977. 2(3): 255-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B50"><label>50.</label><mixed-citation>Pelletier, K.R. and E. Peer, Developing a biofeedback model: alpha EEG feedback as a means for pain control. Int J Clin Exp Hypn, 1977. 25(4): 361-71</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B51"><label>51.</label><mixed-citation>Dahl, W.D., An alpha rhythm feedback control unit. Rep U S Nav Med Res Lab, 1962. 5848: 20</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B52"><label>52.</label><mixed-citation>Smith, K.U. and S.D. Ansell, Closed-Loop Digital Computer System for Study of Sensory Feedback Effects of Brain Rhythms. Am J Phys Med, 1965. 44: 125-37</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B53"><label>53.</label><mixed-citation>Nowlis, D.P. and J. Kamiya, The control of electroencephalographic alpha rhythms through auditory feedback and the associated mental activity. Psychophysiology, 1970. 6(4): 476-84</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B54"><label>54.</label><mixed-citation>Nowlis, D.P. and E.C. Wortz, Control of the ratio of midline parietal to midline frontal EEG alpha rhythms through auditory feedback. Percept Mot Skills, 1973. 37(3): 815-24</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B55"><label>55.</label><mixed-citation>Sterman, M.B. and L. Friar, Suppression of seizures in an epileptic following sensorimotor EEG feedback training. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, 1972. 33(1): 89-95</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B56"><label>56.</label><mixed-citation>Sterman, M.B., L.R. Macdonald, and R.K. Stone, Biofeedback training of the sensorimotor electroencephalogram rhythm in man: effects on epilepsy. Epilepsia, 1974. 15(3): 395-416</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B57"><label>57.</label><mixed-citation>Sterman, M.B., EEG biofeedback: physiological behavior modification. Neurosci Biobehav Rev, 1981. 5(3): 405-12</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B58"><label>58.</label><mixed-citation>Dennett, D.C., Consciousness explained. 1st ed. 1991, Boston: Little, Brown and Co. XIII, 511 p</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B59"><label>59.</label><mixed-citation>Walter, W.G., A machine that learns. Scientific American, 1951. 185(2): 60-63</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B60"><label>60.</label><mixed-citation>Walter, W.G., An imitation of life. Scientific American, 1950. 182(5): 42-45</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B61"><label>61.</label><mixed-citation>Frank, K., Some approaches to the technical problem of chronic excitation of peripheral nerve. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol., 1968. 77:761-771</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B62"><label>62.</label><mixed-citation>Schmidt, E.M., Cortical Control of Robotic Devices And Neuromuscular Stimulators. Neurobionics: An Interdisciplinary Approach to Substitute Impaired Functions of the Human Nervous System, 2013: 289</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B63"><label>63.</label><mixed-citation>Humphrey, D.R., E.M. Schmidt, and W.D. Thompson, Predicting measures of motor performance from multiple cortical spike trains. Science, 1970. 170(3959): 758-62</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B64"><label>64.</label><mixed-citation>Schmidt, E.M., Single neuron recording from motor cortex as a possible source of signals for control of external devices. Ann Biomed Eng, 1980. 8(4-6): 339-49</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B65"><label>65.</label><mixed-citation>Fetz, E.E., Operant conditioning of cortical unit activity. Science, 1969. 163(3870): 955-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B66"><label>66.</label><mixed-citation>Brindley, G.S. and M.D. Craggs, The electrical activity in the motor cortex that accompanies voluntary movement. J Physiol, 1972. 223(1): 28P-29P</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B67"><label>67.</label><mixed-citation>Craggs, M.D., Electrical activity of the motor cortex associated with voluntary movements in the baboon. J Physiol, 1974. 237(2): 12P-13P</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B68"><label>68.</label><mixed-citation>Craggs, M.D., Cortical control of motor prostheses: using the cord-transected baboon as the primate model for human paraplegia. Adv Neurol, 1975. 10: 91-101</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B69"><label>69.</label><mixed-citation>Collins, W.R., Jr., F.E. Nulsen, and C.T. Randt, Relation of peripheral nerve fiber size and sensation in man. Arch Neurol, 1960. 3: 381-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B70"><label>70.</label><mixed-citation>Hensel, H. and K.K. Boman, Afferent impulses in cutaneous sensory nerves in human subjects. J Neurophysiol, 1960. 23: 564-78</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B71"><label>71.</label><mixed-citation>Brindley, G.S. and W.S. Lewin, The sensations produced by electrical stimulation of the visual cortex. J Physiol, 1968. 196(2): 479-93</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B72"><label>72.</label><mixed-citation>Brindley, G.S. and W.S. Lewin, The visual sensations produced by electrical stimulation of the medial occipital cortex. J Physiol, 1968. 194(2): 54-5P</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B73"><label>73.</label><mixed-citation>Libet, B., et al., Production of Threshold Levels of Conscious Sensation by Electrical Stimulation of Human Somatosensory Cortex. J Neurophysiol, 1964. 27: 546-78</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B74"><label>74.</label><mixed-citation>House, W.H., Cochlear implants. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol, 1976. 85(suppl 27): 3-91</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B75"><label>75.</label><mixed-citation>Djourno, A. and C. Eyries, Prothese auditive par excitation electrique a distance du nerf sensoriel a laide dun bobinage inclus a demeure. Presse me'dicale, 1957. 65(63): 1417</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B76"><label>76.</label><mixed-citation>Simmons, F.B., et al., Electrical Stimulation of Acoustical Nerve and Inferior Colliculus. Arch Otolaryngol, 1964. 79: 559-68</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B77"><label>77.</label><mixed-citation>Wilson, B.S. and M.F. Dorman, Cochlear implants: a remarkable past and a brilliant future. Hear Res, 2008. 242(1-2): 3-21</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B78"><label>78.</label><mixed-citation>Loizou, P.C., Introduction to cochlear implants. IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag, 1999. 18(1): 32-42</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B79"><label>79.</label><mixed-citation>Eddington, D.K., Speech discrimination in deaf subjects with cochlear implants. J Acoust Soc Am, 1980. 68(3): 885-91</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B80"><label>80.</label><mixed-citation>Eddington, D.K., Speech recognition in deaf subjects with multichannel intracochlear electrodes. Ann N Y Acad Sci, 1983. 405: 241-58</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B81"><label>81.</label><mixed-citation>Brindley, G.S., Sensations produced by electrical stimulation of the occipital poles of the cerebral hemispheres, and their use in constructing visual prostheses. Ann R Coll Surg Engl, 1970. 47(2): 106-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B82"><label>82.</label><mixed-citation>Dobelle, W.H., M.G. Mladejovsky, and J.P. Girvin, Artifical vision for the blind: electrical stimulation of visual cortex offers hope for a functional prosthesis. Science, 1974. 183(4123): 440-4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B83"><label>83.</label><mixed-citation>Dobelle, W.H. and M.G. Mladejovsky, Phosphenes produced by electrical stimulation of human occipital cortex, and their application to the development of a prosthesis for the blind. J Physiol, 1974. 243(2): 553-76</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B84"><label>84.</label><mixed-citation>Dobelle, W.H., et al., "Braille" reading by a blind volunteer by visual cortex stimulation. Nature, 1976. 259(5539): 111-2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B85"><label>85.</label><mixed-citation>Dobelle, W.H., et al., Artificial vision for the blind by electrical stimulation of the visual cortex. Neurosurgery, 1979. 5(4): 521-7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B86"><label>86.</label><mixed-citation>Nicolelis, M.A., et al., Induction of immediate spatiotemporal changes in thalamic networks by peripheral block of ascending cutaneous information. Nature, 1993. 361(6412): 533-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B87"><label>87.</label><mixed-citation>Nicolelis, M.A., et al., Sensorimotor encoding by synchronous neural ensemble activity at multiple levels of the somatosensory system. Science, 1995. 268(5215): 1353-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B88"><label>88.</label><mixed-citation>Buzsaki, G., et al., Multisite recording of brain field potentials and unit activity in freely moving rats. J Neurosci Methods, 1989. 28(3): 209-17</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B89"><label>89.</label><mixed-citation>Chapin, J.K., et al., Real-time control of a robot arm using simultaneously recorded neurons in the motor cortex. Nat Neurosci, 1999. 2(7): 664-70</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B90"><label>90.</label><mixed-citation>Wessberg, J., et al., Real-time prediction of hand trajectory by ensembles of cortical neurons in primates. Nature, 2000. 408(6810): 361-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B91"><label>91.</label><mixed-citation>Vidal, J.-J., Toward direct brain-computer communication. Annual review of Biophysics and Bioengineering, 1973. 2(1): 157-180</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B92"><label>92.</label><mixed-citation>Bozinovski, S., M. Sestakov, and L. Bozinovska. Using EEG alpha rhythm to control a mobile robot. in Proceedings of the Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. 1988</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B93"><label>93.</label><mixed-citation>Berger, H., Uber das elektrenkephalogramm des menschen. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, 1929. 87(1): 527-570</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B94"><label>94.</label><mixed-citation>Niedermeyer, E., Alpha rhythms as physiological and abnormal phenomena. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 1997. 26(1-3): 31-49</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B95"><label>95.</label><mixed-citation>Birbaumer, N., et al., A spelling device for the paralysed. Nature, 1999. 398(6725): p. 297-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B96"><label>96.</label><mixed-citation>Taylor, D.M., S.I. Tillery, and A.B. Schwartz, Direct cortical control of 3D neuroprosthetic devices. Science, 2002. 296(5574): 1829-32</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B97"><label>97.</label><mixed-citation>Carmena, J.M., et al., Learning to control a brain-machine interface for reaching and grasping by primates. PLoS Biol, 2003. 1(2): E42</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B98"><label>98.</label><mixed-citation>Serruya, M.D., et al., Instant neural control of a movement signal. Nature, 2002. 416(6877): 141-2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B99"><label>99.</label><mixed-citation>Nordhausen, C.T., E.M. Maynard, and R.A. Normann, Single unit recording capabilities of a 100 microelectrode array. Brain Res, 1996. 726(1-2): 129-40</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B100"><label>100.</label><mixed-citation>Maynard, E.M., C.T. Nordhausen, and R.A. Normann, The Utah intracortical Electrode Array: a recording structure for potential brain-computer interfaces. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, 1997. 102(3): 228-39</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B101"><label>101.</label><mixed-citation>Campbell, P.K., et al., A silicon-based, three-dimensional neural interface: manufacturing processes for an intracortical electrode array. Biomedical Engineering, IEEE Transactions on, 1991. 38(8):758-768</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B102"><label>102.</label><mixed-citation>Rousche, P.J. and R.A. Normann, A method for pneumatically inserting an array of penetrating electrodes into cortical tissue. Annals of biomedical engineering, 1992. 20(4): 413-422</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B103"><label>103.</label><mixed-citation>Kennedy, P.R., The cone electrode: a long-term electrode that records from neurites grown onto its recording surface. J Neurosci Methods, 1989. 29(3): 181-93</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B104"><label>104.</label><mixed-citation>Kennedy, P.R., R.A. Bakay, and S.M. Sharpe, Behavioral correlates of action potentials recorded chronically inside the Cone Electrode. Neuroreport, 1992. 3(7): 605-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B105"><label>105.</label><mixed-citation>Kennedy, P.R., S.S. Mirra, and R.A. Bakay, The cone electrode: ultrastructural studies following long-term recording in rat and monkey cortex. Neurosci Lett, 1992. 142(1): 89-94</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B106"><label>106.</label><mixed-citation>Guenther, F.H., et al., A wireless brain-machine interface for real-time speech synthesis. PLoS One, 2009. 4(12): e8218</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B107"><label>107.</label><mixed-citation>Brumberg, J.S., et al., Brain-Computer Interfaces for Speech Communication. Speech Commun, 2010. 52(4): 367-379</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B108"><label>108.</label><mixed-citation>Collinger, J.L., et al., High-performance neuroprosthetic control by an individual with tetraplegia. Lancet, 2013. 381(9866): 557-64</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B109"><label>109.</label><mixed-citation>Velliste, M., et al., Cortical control of a prosthetic arm for self-feeding. Nature, 2008. 453(7198): 1098-101</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B110"><label>110.</label><mixed-citation>Fitzsimmons, N.A., et al., Extracting kinematic parameters for monkey bipedal walking from cortical neuronal ensemble activity. Front Integr Neurosci, 2009. 3: 3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B111"><label>111.</label><mixed-citation>Rajangam, S., et al., Wireless Cortical Brain-Machine Interface for Whole-Body Navigation in Primates. Sci Rep, 2016. 6: 22170</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B112"><label>112.</label><mixed-citation>Xu, Z., et al. On the asynchronously continuous control of mobile robot movement by motor cortical spiking activity. in Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), 2014 36th Annual International Conference of the IEEE. 2014. IEEE</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B113"><label>113.</label><mixed-citation>Bensmaia, S.J. and L.E. Miller, Restoring sensorimotor function through intracortical interfaces: progress and looming challenges. Nature reviews Neuroscience, 2014. 15(5): 313-325</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B114"><label>114.</label><mixed-citation>O'Doherty, J.E., et al., Active tactile exploration using a brain-machine-brain interface. Nature, 201 1. 479(7372): 228-31</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B115"><label>115.</label><mixed-citation>O'Doherty, J.E., et al., A brain-machine interface instructed by direct intracortical microstimulation. Front Integr Neurosci, 2009. 3: 20</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B116"><label>116.</label><mixed-citation>Andersen, R.A., et al., Cognitive neural prosthetics. Trends Cogn Sci, 2004. 8(11): 486-93</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B117"><label>117.</label><mixed-citation>Berger, T.W., et al., A cortical neural prosthesis for restoring and enhancing memory. Journal of Neural Engineering, 2011. 8(4): 046017</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B118"><label>118.</label><mixed-citation>Fuchs, T., et al., Neurofeedback treatment for attentiondeficit/hyperactivity disorder in children: a comparison with methylphenidate. Applied psychophysiology and biofeedback, 2003. 28(1):1-12</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B119"><label>119.</label><mixed-citation>Lubar, J.F., Neurofeedback for the management of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorders. 1995</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B120"><label>120.</label><mixed-citation>Musallam, S., et al., Cognitive control signals for neural prosthetics. Science, 2004. 305(5681): 258-262</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B121"><label>121.</label><mixed-citation>Ramakrishnan, A., et al., Computing Arm Movements with a Monkey Brainet. Sci Rep, 2015. 5: 10767</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B122"><label>122.</label><mixed-citation>Hochberg, L.R., et al., Neuronal ensemble control of prosthetic devices by a human with tetraplegia. Nature, 2006. 442(7099): 164-71</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B123"><label>123.</label><mixed-citation>Hochberg, L.R., et al., Reach and grasp by people with tetraplegia using a neurally controlled robotic arm. Nature, 2012. 485(7398): 372-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B124"><label>124.</label><mixed-citation>Niedermeyer, E. and F.H. Lopes da Silva, Electroencephalography basic principles, clinical applications, and related fields. 2005, Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins,: Philadelphia. p. 1 online resource XIII, 1309 p</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B125"><label>125.</label><mixed-citation>Taheri, B.A., R.T. Knight, and R.L. Smith, A dry electrode for EEG recording. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, 1994. 90(5): 376-83</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B126"><label>126.</label><mixed-citation>Fonseca, C., et al., A novel dry active electrode for EEG recording. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng, 2007. 54(1): 162-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B127"><label>127.</label><mixed-citation>Chi, Y.M., T.P. Jung, and G. Cauwenberghs, Dry-contact and noncontact biopotential electrodes: methodological review. IEEE Rev Biomed Eng, 2010. 3:106-19</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B128"><label>128.</label><mixed-citation>Gargiulo, G., et al., Dry electrode bio-potential recordings. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc, 2010. 2010: 6493-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B129"><label>129.</label><mixed-citation>Chi, Y.M., et al., Dry and noncontact EEG sensors for mobile brain-computer interfaces. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng, 2012. 20(2): 228-35</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B130"><label>130.</label><mixed-citation>Guger, C., et al., Comparison of dry and gel based electrodes for p300 brain-computer interfaces. Front Neurosci, 2012. 6: 60</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B131"><label>131.</label><mixed-citation>Lebedev, M.A. and M.A. Nicolelis, Brain-machine interfaces: past, present and future. Trends Neurosci, 2006. 29(9): 536-46</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B132"><label>132.</label><mixed-citation>Ifft, P.J., et al., A brain-machine interface enables bimanual arm movements in monkeys. Sci Transl Med, 2013. 5(210): p. 210ra154</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B133"><label>133.</label><mixed-citation>Wolpaw, J.R. and D.J. McFarland, Control of a twodimensional movement signal by a noninvasive brain-computer interface in humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2004. 101(51): 17849-54</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B134"><label>134.</label><mixed-citation>Nicolelis, M.A. and M.A. Lebedev, Principles of neural ensemble physiology underlying the operation of brain-machine interfaces. Nat Rev Neurosci, 2009. 10(7): 530-40</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B135"><label>135.</label><mixed-citation>Koralek, A.C., et al., Corticostriatal plasticity is necessary for learning intentional neuroprosthetic skills. Nature, 2012. 483(7389): 331-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B136"><label>136.</label><mixed-citation>Patil, P.G., et al., Ensemble recordings of human subcortical neurons as a source of motor control signals for a brain-machine interface. Neurosurgery, 2004. 55(1): p. 27-35; discussion 35-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B137"><label>137.</label><mixed-citation>Hanson, T.L., et al., Subcortical neuronal ensembles: an analysis of motor task association, tremor, oscillations, and synchrony in human patients. J Neurosci, 2012. 32(25): 8620-32</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B138"><label>138.</label><mixed-citation>Obermaier, B., et al., Information transfer rate in a five-classes brain-computer interface. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng, 2001. 9(3): 283-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B139"><label>139.</label><mixed-citation>Scherer, R., et al., The self-paced graz brain-computer interface: methods and applications. Comput Intell Neurosci, 2007: 79826</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B140"><label>140.</label><mixed-citation>Prasad, G., et al., Applying a brain-computer interface to support motor imagery practice in people with stroke for upper limb recovery: a feasibility study. J Neuroeng Rehabil, 2010. 7: p. 60</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B141"><label>141.</label><mixed-citation>Pfurtscheller, G. and C. Neuper, Future prospects of ERD/ERS in the context of brain-computer interface (BCI) developments. Prog Brain Res, 2006. 159: 433-7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B142"><label>142.</label><mixed-citation>Fazel-Rezai, R., et al., P300 brain computer interface: current challenges and emerging trends. Front Neuroeng, 2012. 5:14</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B143"><label>143.</label><mixed-citation>Lee, P.L., et al., An SSVEP-actuated brain computer interface using phase-tagged flickering sequences: a cursor system. Ann Biomed Eng, 2010. 38(7): 2383-97</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B144"><label>144.</label><mixed-citation>Wang, C., C. Guan, and H. Zhang, P300 brain-computer interface design for communication and control applications. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc, 2005. 5: 5400-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B145"><label>145.</label><mixed-citation>Sellers, E.W., et al., A P300 event-related potential brain-computer interface (BCI): the effects of matrix size and inter stimulus interval on performance. Biol Psychol, 2006. 73(3): 242-52</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B146"><label>146.</label><mixed-citation>Donchin, E., K.M. Spencer, and R. Wijesinghe, The mental prosthesis: assessing the speed of a P300-based brain-computer interface. IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng, 2000. 8(2): 174-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B147"><label>147.</label><mixed-citation>Mirghasemi, H., R. Fazel-Rezai, and M.B. Shamsollahi, Analysis of p300 classifiers in brain computer interface speller. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc, 2006. 1: 6205-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B148"><label>148.</label><mixed-citation>Piccione, F., et al., P300-based brain computer interface: reliability and performance in healthy and paralysed participants. Clin Neurophysiol, 2006. 117(3): 531-7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B149"><label>149.</label><mixed-citation>Townsend, G., et al., A novel P300-based brain-computer interface stimulus presentation paradigm: moving beyond rows and columns. Clin Neurophysiol, 2010. 121(7): 1109-20</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B150"><label>150.</label><mixed-citation>Brunner, P., et al., Rapid Communication with a "P300" Matrix Speller Using Electrocorticographic Signals (ECoG). Front Neurosci, 2011. 5: 5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B151"><label>151.</label><mixed-citation>Santhanam, G., et al., A high-performance brain-computer interface. Nature, 2006. 442(7099): 195-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B152"><label>152.</label><mixed-citation>Lebedev, M.A., et al., Cortical ensemble adaptation to represent velocity of an artificial actuator controlled by a brain-machine interface. J Neurosci, 2005. 25(19): 4681-93</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B153"><label>153.</label><mixed-citation>Serruya, M., et al., Robustness of neuroprosthetic decoding algorithms. Biol Cybern, 2003. 88(3): 219-28</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B154"><label>154.</label><mixed-citation>Lebedev, M.A., J.E. O'Doherty, and M.A. Nicolelis, Decoding of temporal intervals from cortical ensemble activity. J Neurophysiol, 2008. 99(1): 166-86</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B155"><label>155.</label><mixed-citation>Lebedev, M.A. and M.A. Nicolelis, Toward a whole-body neuroprosthetic. Prog Brain Res, 2011. 194: 47-60</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B156"><label>156.</label><mixed-citation>Lebedev, M.A., How to read neuron-dropping curves? Front Syst Neurosci, 2014. 8: p. 102</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B157"><label>157.</label><mixed-citation>Fetz, E.E., Are movement parameters recognizably coded in the activity of single neurons? Behavioral and brain sciences, 1992. 15(04): 679-690</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B158"><label>158.</label><mixed-citation>Evarts, E.V., et al., Spontaneous discharge of single neurons during sleep and waking. Science, 1962. 135(3505): 726-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B159"><label>159.</label><mixed-citation>Evarts, E.V., Temporal Patterns of Discharge of Pyramidal Tract Neurons during Sleep and Waking in the Monkey. J Neurophysiol, 1964. 27: 152-71</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B160"><label>160.</label><mixed-citation>Evarts, E.V., Pyramidal tract activity associated with a conditioned hand movement in the monkey. J Neurophysiol, 1966. 29(6): 1011-27</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B161"><label>161.</label><mixed-citation>Kettner, R.E., A.B. Schwartz, and A.P. Georgopoulos, Primate motor cortex and free arm movements to visual targets in three-dimensional space. III. Positional gradients and population coding of movement direction from various movement origins. J Neurosci, 1988. 8(8): 2938-47</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B162"><label>162.</label><mixed-citation>Schwartz, A.B., R.E. Kettner, and A.P. Georgopoulos, Primate motor cortex and free arm movements to visual targets in three-dimensional space. I. Relations between single cell discharge and direction of movement. J Neurosci, 1988. 8(8): 2913-27</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B163"><label>163.</label><mixed-citation>Batista, A.P., et al., Cortical neural prosthesis performance improves when eye position is monitored. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng, 2008. 16(1): 24-31</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B164"><label>164.</label><mixed-citation>Musallam, S., et al., Cognitive control signals for neural prosthetics. Science, 2004. 305(5681): 258-62</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B165"><label>165.</label><mixed-citation>Ganguly, K. and J.M. Carmena, Emergence of a stable cortical map for neuroprosthetic control. PLoS Biol, 2009. 7(7): e1000153</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B166"><label>166.</label><mixed-citation>Blazquez, P.M., et al., A network representation of response probability in the striatum. Neuron, 2002. 33(6): 973-82</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B167"><label>167.</label><mixed-citation>Montijn, J.S., M. Vinck, and C.M. Pennartz, Population coding in mouse visual cortex: response reliability and dissociability of stimulus tuning and noise correlation. Front Comput Neurosci, 2014. 8: 58</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B168"><label>168.</label><mixed-citation>Nicolelis, M.A.L., Beyond boundaries : the new neuroscience of connecting brains with machines--and how it will change our lives. 1st ed. 2011, New York: Times Books/ Henry Holt and Co. 353 p</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B169"><label>169.</label><mixed-citation>Fusi, S., E.K. Miller, and M. Rigotti, Why neurons mix: high dimensionality for higher cognition. Curr Opin Neurobiol, 2016. 37: 66-74</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B170"><label>170.</label><mixed-citation>Friston, K., J. Kilner, and L. Harrison, A free energy principle for the brain. J Physiol Paris, 2006. 100(1-3): 70-87</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B171"><label>171.</label><mixed-citation>Friston, K., The free-energy principle: a rough guide to the brain? Trends Cogn Sci, 2009. 13(7): 293-301</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B172"><label>172.</label><mixed-citation>Friston, K., The free-energy principle: a unified brain theory? Nat Rev Neurosci, 2010. 11(2): 127-38</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B173"><label>173.</label><mixed-citation>Tozzi, A., M. Zare, and A.A. Benasich, New perspectives on spontaneous brain activity: dynamic networks and energy matter. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 2016. 10</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B174"><label>174.</label><mixed-citation>Schwarz, D.A., et al., Chronic, wireless recordings of large-scale brain activity in freely moving rhesus monkeys. Nat Methods, 2014. 11(6): 670-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B175"><label>175.</label><mixed-citation>Kralik, J.D., et al., Techniques for long-term multisite neuronal ensemble recordings in behaving animals. Methods, 2001. 25(2): 121-50</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B176"><label>176.</label><mixed-citation>Gualtierotti, T. and P. Bailey, A neutral buoyancy microelectrode for prolonged recording from single nerve units. Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology, 1968. 25(1): 77-81</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B177"><label>177.</label><mixed-citation>Musallam, S., et al., A floating metal microelectrode array for chronic implantation. Journal of neuroscience methods, 2007. 160(1): 122-127</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B178"><label>178.</label><mixed-citation>Neves, H., et al. Development of modular multifunctional probe arrays for cerebral applications. in Neural Engineering, 2007. CNE'07. 3rd International IEEE/EMBS Conference on. 2007. IEEE</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B179"><label>179.</label><mixed-citation>Spieth, S., et al., A floating 3D silicon microprobe array for neural drug delivery compatible with electrical recording. Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering, 2011. 21(12): p. 125001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B180"><label>180.</label><mixed-citation>Hassler, C., et al. Chronic intracortical implantation of saccharose-coated flexible shaft electrodes into the cortex of rats. in Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBC, 2011 Annual International Conference of the IEEE. 2011. IEEE</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B181"><label>181.</label><mixed-citation>Kozai, T.D.Y. and D.R. Kipke, Insertion shuttle with carboxyl terminated self-assembled monolayer coatings for implanting flexible polymer neural probes in the brain. Journal of neuroscience methods, 2009. 184(2): 199-205</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B182"><label>182.</label><mixed-citation>Agorelius, J., et al., An array of highly flexible electrodes with a tailored configuration locked by gelatin during implantation - initial evaluation in cortex cerebri of awake rats. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 2015. 9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B183"><label>183.</label><mixed-citation>Takeuchi, S., et al., 3D flexible multichannel neural probe array. Journal of micromechanics and microengineering, 2003. 14(1): p. 104</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B184"><label>184.</label><mixed-citation>Sohal, H.S., et al., The Sinusoidal Probe: a new approach to improve electrode longevity. Frontiers in Neuroengineering, 2014. 7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B185"><label>185.</label><mixed-citation>Anderson, D.J., et al., Batch fabricated thin-film electrodes for stimulation of the central auditory system. Biomedical Engineering, IEEE Transactions on, 1989. 36(7): 693-704</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B186"><label>186.</label><mixed-citation>Najafi, K., K.D. Wise, and T. Mochizuki, A high-yield IC-compatible multichannel recording array. Electron Devices, IEEE Transactions on, 1985. 32(7): 1206-1211</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B187"><label>187.</label><mixed-citation>Vetter, R.J., et al., Chronic neural recording using silicon-substrate microelectrode arrays implanted in cerebral cortex. Biomedical Engineering, IEEE Transactions on, 2004. 51(6): 896-904</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B188"><label>188.</label><mixed-citation>Weiland, J.D. and D.J. Anderson, Chronic neural stimulation with thin-film, iridium oxide electrodes. Biomedical Engineering, IEEE Transactions on, 2000. 47(7): 911-918</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B189"><label>189.</label><mixed-citation>Recce, M. and J. O’keefe. The tetrode: a new technique for multi-unit extracellular recording. in Soc Neurosci Abstr. 1989</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B190"><label>190.</label><mixed-citation>Jog, M., et al., Tetrode technology: advances in implantable hardware, neuroimaging, and data analysis techniques. Journal of neuroscience methods, 2002. 117(2): 141-152</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B191"><label>191.</label><mixed-citation>Santos, L., et al., A novel tetrode microdrive for simultaneous multi-neuron recording from different regions of primate brain. Journal of neuroscience methods, 2012. 205(2): 368-374</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B192"><label>192.</label><mixed-citation>Seo, D., et al., Model validation of untethered, ultrasonic neural dust motes for cortical recording. J Neurosci Methods, 2015. 244: 114-22</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B193"><label>193.</label><mixed-citation>Llinas, R.R., et al., Neuro-vascular central nervous recording/stimulating system: Using nanotechnology probes. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 2005. 7(2-3): 111-127</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B194"><label>194.</label><mixed-citation>Boniface, S. and N. Antoun, Endovascular electroencephalography: the technique and its application during carotid amytal assessment. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery &amp; Psychiatry, 1997. 62(2): 193-195</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B195"><label>195.</label><mixed-citation>Oxley, T.J., et al., Minimally invasive endovascular stent-electrode array for high-fidelity, chronic recordings of cortical neural activity. Nature biotechnology, 2016</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B196"><label>196.</label><mixed-citation>Tasaki, I., et al., Changes in fluorescence, turbidity, and birefringence associated with nerve excitation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 1968. 61(3): 883</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B197"><label>197.</label><mixed-citation>Patrick, J., et al., Changes in extrinsic fluorescence intensity of the electroplax membrane during electrical excitation. The Journal of membrane biology, 1971. 5(1): 102-120</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B198"><label>198.</label><mixed-citation>Grinvald, A., et al., Optical imaging of neuronal activity. Physiological reviews, 1988. 68(4): 1285-1366</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B199"><label>199.</label><mixed-citation>Grinvald, A. and R. Hildesheim, VSDI: a new era in functional imaging of cortical dynamics. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2004. 5(11): 874-885</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B200"><label>200.</label><mixed-citation>Stosiek, C., et al., In vivo two-photon calcium imaging of neuronal networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2003. 100(12): 7319-7324</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B201"><label>201.</label><mixed-citation>Smetters, D., A. Majewska, and R. Yuste, Detecting action potentials in neuronal populations with calcium imaging. Methods, 1999. 18(2): 215-221</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B202"><label>202.</label><mixed-citation>Grewe, B.F., et al., High-speed in vivo calcium imaging reveals neuronal network activity with near-millisecond precision. Nature methods, 2010. 7(5): 399-405</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B203"><label>203.</label><mixed-citation>Clancy, K.B., et al., Volitional modulation of optically recorded calcium signals during neuroprosthetic learning. Nat Neurosci, 2014. 17(6): 807-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B204"><label>204.</label><mixed-citation>Ziv, Y., et al., Long-term dynamics of CA1 hippocampal place codes. Nature neuroscience, 2013. 16(3): 264-266</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B205"><label>205.</label><mixed-citation>Crone, N.E., A. Sinai, and A. Korzeniewska, High-frequency gamma oscillations and human brain mapping with electrocorticography. Progress in brain research, 2006. 159: 275-295</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B206"><label>206.</label><mixed-citation>Leuthardt, E.C., et al., Electrocorticography-based brain computer interface - the Seattle experience. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng, 2006. 14(2):194-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B207"><label>207.</label><mixed-citation>Hill, N.J., et al., Recording human electrocorticographic (ECoG) signals for neuroscientific research and real-time functional cortical mapping. J Vis Exp, 2012(64)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B208"><label>208.</label><mixed-citation>Miller, K.J., et al., Real-time functional brain mapping using electrocorticography. Neuroimage, 2007. 37(2): 504-507</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B209"><label>209.</label><mixed-citation>Viventi, J., et al., Flexible, foldable, actively multiplexed, high-density electrode array for mapping brain activity in vivo. Nature neuroscience, 2011. 14(12): 1599-1605</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B210"><label>210.</label><mixed-citation>Bleichner, M., et al., Give me a sign: decoding four complex hand gestures based on high-density ECoG. Brain Structure and Function, 2016. 221(1): 203-216</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B211"><label>211.</label><mixed-citation>Wang, W., et al. Human motor cortical activity recorded with Micro-ECoG electrodes, during individual finger movements. in 2009 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. 2009. IEEE</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B212"><label>212.</label><mixed-citation>Harrison, R.R., et al., Wireless neural recording with single low-power integrated circuit. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng, 2009. 17(4): 322-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B213"><label>213.</label><mixed-citation>Chestek, C.A., et al., HermesC: low-power wireless neural recording system for freely moving primates. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng, 2009. 17(4): 330-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B214"><label>214.</label><mixed-citation>Chae, M., et al. A 128-channel 6mW wireless neural recording ic with on-the-fly spike sorting and uwb tansmitter. in 2008 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference-Digest of Technical Papers. 2008. IEEE</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B215"><label>215.</label><mixed-citation>Kim, S., et al., Integrated wireless neural interface based on the Utah electrode array. Biomedical microdevices, 2009. 11(2): 453-466</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B216"><label>216.</label><mixed-citation>Szuts, T.A., et al., A wireless multi-channel neural amplifier for freely moving animals. Nature neuroscience, 2011. 14(2): 263-269</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B217"><label>217.</label><mixed-citation>Obeid, I., M.A. Nicolelis, and P.D. Wolf, A multichannel telemetry system for single unit neural recordings. J Neurosci Methods, 2004. 133(1-2): 33-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B218"><label>218.</label><mixed-citation>Mohseni, P., et al., Wireless multichannel biopotential recording using an integrated FM telemetry circuit. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, 2005. 13(3): 263-271</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B219"><label>219.</label><mixed-citation>Morizio, J., et al. Wireless headstage for neural prosthetics. in Conference Proceedings. 2nd International IEEE EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering, 2005. 2005. IEEE</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B220"><label>220.</label><mixed-citation>Borghi, T., et al. A compact multichannel system for acquisition and processing of neural signals. in 2007 29th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. 2007. IEEE</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B221"><label>221.</label><mixed-citation>Kim, S.P., et al., A comparison of optimal MIMO linear and nonlinear models for brain-machine interfaces. J Neural Eng, 2006. 3(2): 145-61</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B222"><label>222.</label><mixed-citation>Wahnoun, R., J. He, and S.I.H. Tillery, Selection and parameterization of cortical neurons for neuroprosthetic control. Journal of neural engineering, 2006. 3(2):162</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B223"><label>223.</label><mixed-citation>Tkach, D., J. Reimer, and N.G. Hatsopoulos, Observation-based learning for brain-machine interfaces. Curr Opin Neurobiol, 2008. 18(6): 589-94</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B224"><label>224.</label><mixed-citation>Li, Z., et al., Adaptive decoding for brain-machine interfaces through Bayesian parameter updates. Neural Comput, 2011. 23(12): 3162-204</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B225"><label>225.</label><mixed-citation>Orsborn, A.L., et al., Closed-loop decoder adaptation on intermediate time-scales facilitates rapid BMI performance improvements independent of decoder initialization conditions. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng, 2012. 20(4): 468-77</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B226"><label>226.</label><mixed-citation>Dangi, S., et al., Continuous closed-loop decoder adaptation with a recursive maximum likelihood algorithm allows for rapid performance acquisition in brain-machine interfaces. Neural Comput, 2014. 26(9): 1811-39</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B227"><label>227.</label><mixed-citation>Wessberg, J. and M.A. Nicolelis, Optimizing a linear algorithm for real-time robotic control using chronic cortical ensemble recordings in monkeys. J Cogn Neurosci, 2004. 16(6): 1022-35</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B228"><label>228.</label><mixed-citation>Georgopoulos, A.P., et al., Mental rotation of the neuronal population vector. Science, 1989. 243(4888): 234-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B229"><label>229.</label><mixed-citation>Ganguly, K., et al., Reversible large-scale modification of cortical networks during neuroprosthetic control. Nat Neurosci, 2011. 14(5): 662-7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B230"><label>230.</label><mixed-citation>Kalman, R.E., A new approach to linear filtering and prediction problems. Journal of basic Engineering, 1960. 82(1): 35-45</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B231"><label>231.</label><mixed-citation>Kalman, R.E. and R.S. Bucy, New results in linear filtering and prediction theory. Journal of basic engineering, 1961. 83(1): 95-108</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B232"><label>232.</label><mixed-citation>Serruya, M., A. Shaikhouni, and J. Donoghue. Neural decoding of cursor motion using a Kalman filter. in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 15: Proceedings of the 2002 Conference. 2003. MIT Press</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B233"><label>233.</label><mixed-citation>Wu, W., et al., Closed-loop neural control of cursor motion using a Kalman filter. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc, 2004. 6: 4126-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B234"><label>234.</label><mixed-citation>Li, Z., et al., Unscented Kalman filter for brain-machine interfaces. PLoS One, 2009. 4(7): e6243</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B235"><label>235.</label><mixed-citation>Sussillo, D., et al., A recurrent neural network for closed-loop intracortical brain-machine interface decoders. Journal of neural engineering, 2012. 9(2): 026027</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B236"><label>236.</label><mixed-citation>Kowalski, K.C., B.D. He, and L. Srinivasan, Dynamic analysis of naive adaptive brain-machine interfaces. Neural Comput, 2013. 25(9): 2373-420</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B237"><label>237.</label><mixed-citation>Shanechi, M.M., et al., High-performance brain-machine interface enabled by an adaptive optimal feedback-controlled point process decoder. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc, 2014. 2014: 6493-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B238"><label>238.</label><mixed-citation>Suminski, A.J., et al. Online adaptive decoding of intended movements with a hybrid kinetic and kinematic brain machine interface. in 2013 35th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC). 2013. IEEE</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B239"><label>239.</label><mixed-citation>DiGiovanna, J., et al., Coadaptive brain-machine interface via reinforcement learning. IEEE transactions on biomedical engineering, 2009. 56(1): 54-64</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B240"><label>240.</label><mixed-citation>Mahmoudi, B., et al., Towards autonomous neuroprosthetic control using Hebbian reinforcement learning. Journal of neural engineering, 2013. 10(6): 066005</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B241"><label>241.</label><mixed-citation>Pohlmeyer, E.A., et al., Using reinforcement learning to provide stable brain-machine interface control despite neural input reorganization. PloS one, 2014. 9(1): e87253</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B242"><label>242.</label><mixed-citation>Sherrington, C.S., The integrative action of the nervous system. 1906, New York,: C. Scribner's sons. XVI, 411 p</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B243"><label>243.</label><mixed-citation>Guertin, P.A., The mammalian central pattern generator for locomotion. Brain Research Reviews, 2009. 62(1): 45-56</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B244"><label>244.</label><mixed-citation>Cordo, P.J. and V.S. Gurfinkel, Motor coordination can be fully understood only by studying complex movements. Progress in brain research, 2004. 143: 29-38</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B245"><label>245.</label><mixed-citation>Head, H. and G. Holmes, Sensory disturbances from cerebral lesions. Brain, 1911. 34(2-3): 102-254</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B246"><label>246.</label><mixed-citation>Kawato, M., Internal models for motor control and trajectory planning. Current opinion in neurobiology, 1999. 9(6): 718-727</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B247"><label>247.</label><mixed-citation>Wolpert, D.M., Z. Ghahramani, and M.I. Jordan, An internal model for sensorimotor integration. Science, 1995. 269(5232): 1880</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B248"><label>248.</label><mixed-citation>Feldman, A.G., Once more on the equilibrium-point hypothesis (X model) for motor control. Journal of motor behavior, 1986. 18(1): 17-54</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B249"><label>249.</label><mixed-citation>Feldman, A.G. and M.F. Levin, The equilibrium-point hypothesis-past, present and future, in Progress in motor control. 2009, Springer: 699-726</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B250"><label>250.</label><mixed-citation>Hochberg, L.R. and J.P. Donoghue, Sensors for brain-computer interfaces. IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag, 2006. 25(5): 32-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B251"><label>251.</label><mixed-citation>Cheng, G., et al. Bipedal locomotion with a humanoid robot controlled by cortical ensemble activity. in Abstr. Soc. Neurosci. 2007</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B252"><label>252.</label><mixed-citation>Kawato, M., Brain controlled robots. 2008</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B253"><label>253.</label><mixed-citation>Morrow, M.M. and L.E. Miller, Prediction of muscle activity by populations of sequentially recorded primary motor cortex neurons. Journal of neurophysiology, 2003. 89(4): 2279-2288</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B254"><label>254.</label><mixed-citation>Santucci, D.M., et al., Frontal and parietal cortical ensembles predict single-trial muscle activity during reaching movements in primates. Eur J Neurosci, 2005. 22(6): 1529-40</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B255"><label>255.</label><mixed-citation>Pohlmeyer, E.A., et al., Prediction of upper limb muscle activity from motor cortical discharge during reaching. Journal of neural engineering, 2007. 4(4): 369</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B256"><label>256.</label><mixed-citation>Seifert, H.M. and A.J. Fuglevand, Restoration of movement using functional electrical stimulation and Bayes' theorem. The journal of Neuroscience, 2002. 22(21): 9465-9474</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B257"><label>257.</label><mixed-citation>Johnson, L.A. and A.J. Fuglevand, Mimicking muscle activity with electrical stimulation. Journal of neural engineering, 2011. 8(1): 016009</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B258"><label>258.</label><mixed-citation>Pfurtscheller, J., et al., [Functional electrical stimulation instead of surgery? Improvement of grasping function with FES in a patient with C5 tetraplegia]. Unfallchirurg, 2005. 108(7): 587-90</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B259"><label>259.</label><mixed-citation>Pfurtscheller, G., et al., ‘Thought’-control of functional electrical stimulation to restore hand grasp in a patient with tetraplegia. Neuroscience letters, 2003. 351(1): 33-36</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B260"><label>260.</label><mixed-citation>Moritz, C.T., S.I. Perlmutter, and E.E. Fetz, Direct control of paralysed muscles by cortical neurons. Nature, 2008. 456(7222): 639-42</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B261"><label>261.</label><mixed-citation>Ethier, C., et al., Restoration of grasp following paralysis through brain-controlled stimulation of muscles. Nature, 2012. 485(7398): 368-371</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B262"><label>262.</label><mixed-citation>Pohlmeyer, E.A., et al., Toward the restoration of hand use to a paralyzed monkey: brain-controlled functional electrical stimulation of forearm muscles. PloS one, 2009. 4(6): e5924</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B263"><label>263.</label><mixed-citation>Bouton, C.E., et al., Restoring cortical control of functional movement in a human with quadriplegia. Nature, 2016</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B264"><label>264.</label><mixed-citation>Cramer, S.C., et al., Harnessing neuroplasticity for clinical applications. Brain, 2011. 134(Pt 6):1591-609</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B265"><label>265.</label><mixed-citation>Dobkin, B.H., Brain-computer interface technology as a tool to augment plasticity and outcomes for neurological rehabilitation. J Physiol, 2007. 579(Pt 3): 637-42</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B266"><label>266.</label><mixed-citation>Grosse-Wentrup, M., D. Mattia, and K. Oweiss, Using brain-computer interfaces to induce neural plasticity and restore function. Journal of neural engineering, 2011. 8(2): 025004</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B267"><label>267.</label><mixed-citation>Di Pino, G., et al., Augmentation-related brain plasticity. Frontiers in systems neuroscience, 2014. 8: 109</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B268"><label>268.</label><mixed-citation>Oweiss, K.G. and I.S. Badreldin, Neuroplasticity subserving the operation of brain-machine interfaces. Neurobiol Dis, 2015. 83:161-71</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B269"><label>269.</label><mixed-citation>Zacksenhouse, M., et al., Cortical modulations increase in early sessions with brain-machine interface. PLoS One, 2007. 2(7): e619</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B270"><label>270.</label><mixed-citation>Lebedev, M.A., et al., Future developments in brain-machine interface research. Clinics (Sao Paulo), 2011. 66 Suppl 1: 25-32</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B271"><label>271.</label><mixed-citation>Dobelle, W.H., Artificial vision for the blind. The summit may be closer than you think. ASAIO J, 1994. 40(4): 919-22</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B272"><label>272.</label><mixed-citation>Rothschild, R.M., Neuroengineering tools/applications for bidirectional interfaces, brain-computer interfaces, and neuroprosthetic implants - a review of recent progress. Front Neuroeng, 2010. 3:112</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B273"><label>273.</label><mixed-citation>Ghazanfar, A.A., D.J. Krupa, and M.A. Nicolelis, Role of cortical feedback in the receptive field structure and nonlinear response properties of somatosensory thalamic neurons. Exp Brain Res, 2001. 141(1):88-100</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B274"><label>274.</label><mixed-citation>Krupa, D.J., et al., Layer-specific somatosensory cortical activation during active tactile discrimination. Science, 2004. 304(5679):1989-92</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B275"><label>275.</label><mixed-citation>Pais-Vieira, M., et al., Simultaneous top-down modulation of the primary somatosensory cortex and thalamic nuclei during active tactile discrimination. J Neurosci, 2013. 33(9): 4076-93</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B276"><label>276.</label><mixed-citation>Lebedev, M.A., J.M. Denton, and R.J. Nelson, Vibration-entrained and premovement activity in monkey primary somatosensory cortex. J Neurophysiol, 1994. 72(4): 1654-73</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B277"><label>277.</label><mixed-citation>Gilbert, C.D. and M. Sigman, Brain states: top-down influences in sensory processing. Neuron, 2007. 54(5): 677-696</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B278"><label>278.</label><mixed-citation>Siegel, M., K.P. Kording, and P. Konig, Integrating top-down and bottom-up sensory processing by somato-dendritic interactions. Journal of computational neuroscience, 2000. 8(2): 161-173</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B279"><label>279.</label><mixed-citation>Cowey, A. and P. Stoerig, The neurobiology of blindsight. Trends in neurosciences, 1991. 14(4):140-145</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B280"><label>280.</label><mixed-citation>Stoerig, P. and A. Cowey, Blindsight in man and monkey. Brain, 1997. 120(3): 535-559</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B281"><label>281.</label><mixed-citation>Weiskrantz, L., Blindsight revisited. Current opinion in neurobiology, 1996. 6(2): 215-220</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B282"><label>282.</label><mixed-citation>Cowey, A. and P. Stoerig, Visual detection in monkeys with blindsight. Neuropsychologia, 1997. 35(7): 929-939</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B283"><label>283.</label><mixed-citation>Penfield, W. and E. Boldrey, Somatic motor and sensory representation in the cerebral cortex of man as studied by electrical stimulation. Brain: A journal of neurology, 1937</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B284"><label>284.</label><mixed-citation>Romo, R., et al., Somatosensory discrimination based on cortical microstimulation. Nature, 1998. 392(6674): 387-390</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B285"><label>285.</label><mixed-citation>Fitzsimmons, N.A., et al., Primate reaching cued by multichannel spatiotemporal cortical microstimulation. J Neurosci, 2007. 27(21): 5593-602</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B286"><label>286.</label><mixed-citation>Tabot, G.A., et al., Restoring the sense of touch with a prosthetic hand through a brain interface. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2013. 110(45): 18279-18284</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B287"><label>287.</label><mixed-citation>Pesaran, B., S. Musallam, and R.A. Andersen, Cognitive neural prosthetics. Curr Biol, 2006. 16(3): R77-80</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B288"><label>288.</label><mixed-citation>Ifft, P.J., M.A. Lebedev, and M.A. Nicolelis, Reprogramming movements: extraction of motor intentions from cortical ensemble activity when movement goals change. Front Neuroeng, 2012. 5:16</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B289"><label>289.</label><mixed-citation>Pais-Vieira, M., et al., A brain-to-brain interface for real-time sharing of sensorimotor information. Sci Rep, 2013. 3:1319</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B290"><label>290.</label><mixed-citation>Yoo, S.-S., et al., Non-invasive brain-to-brain interface (BBI): establishing functional links between two brains. PloS one, 2013. 8(4): e60410</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B291"><label>291.</label><mixed-citation>Rao, R.P., et al., A direct brain-to-brain interface in humans. PLoS One, 2014. 9(11): e111332</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
