Dicationic Ionic Liquids with a Linker of Ether Nature

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

Bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide dicationic ionic liquids with an ethereal linker between imidazolium cations have been synthesized. Their thermal stability has been studied, melting points, viscosity, and volatility in vacuum have been measured. The properties of the synthesized ionic liquids with ethereal linkers have been compared with the properties of ionic liquids of a similar structure, but with polymethylene linkers.

About the authors

V. G. Krasovskii

Zelinsky Institute of Organic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: miyusha@mail.ru
119991, Moscow, Russia

G. I. Kapustin

Zelinsky Institute of Organic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: miyusha@mail.ru
119991, Moscow, Russia

L. M. Glukhov

Zelinsky Institute of Organic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: miyusha@mail.ru
119991, Moscow, Russia

E. A. Chernikova

Zelinsky Institute of Organic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: miyusha@mail.ru
119991, Moscow, Russia

L. M. Kustov

Zelinsky Institute of Organic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences; Department of Chemistry, Moscow State University

Author for correspondence.
Email: miyusha@mail.ru
119991, Moscow, Russia; 119992, Moscow, Russia

References

  1. Kaur G., Kumar H., Singla M. // J. Mol. Liq. 2022. V. 351. P. 118556.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2022.118556
  2. Pei Y., Zhang Y., Ma J. et al. // Materials Today Nano. 2022. V. 17. 100159.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtnano.2021.100159
  3. Ivanov M.Yu., Surovtsev N.V., Fedin M.V. // Успехи химии. 2022. Т. 91. RCR5031
  4. Tomar P., Jain D. // J. Adv. Sci. Res. 2022. V. 13. P. 1.https://doi.org/10.55218/JASR.202213601
  5. Kazemi M., Shiri L. // J. Synth. Chem. 2022. V. 1. P. 1.https://doi.org/10.22034/jsc.2022.149201
  6. Tiago G.A.O., Matias I.A.S., Ribeiro A.P. C. et al. // Molecules. 2020. V. 25. 5812. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25245812
  7. Zheng Y., Wang D., Kaushik S. et al. // EnergyChem. 2022. V. 4. 100075.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enchem.2022.100075
  8. Yudaev P.A., Chistyakov E.M. // ChemEngineering. 2022. V. 6. P. 6.https://doi.org/10.3390/chemengineering6010006
  9. Mahanty B., Mohapatra P K. // Separation Science and Technology. 2022. V. 57. P. 2792.https://doi.org/10.1080/01496395.2022.2038204
  10. Friess K., Izak P., Karaszova M. et al. // Membranes. 2021. V. 11. P. 97.https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes11020097
  11. Ocreto J.B., Chen W.-H., Rollon A.P. et al. // Chem. Eng. J. 2022. V. 445. 136733.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2022.136733
  12. Ali M.K.A., Abdelkareem M.A.A., Chowdary K. et al. // Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part J: Journal of Engineering Tribology. 2023. V. 237. P. 3.https://doi.org/10.1177/13506501221091133
  13. Piper S.L., Kar M., MacFarlane D.R. et al. // Green Chem. 2022. V. 24. P. 102.https://doi.org/10.1039/D1GC03420K
  14. Li D.-D., Ji X.-Y., Chen M. et al. // J. Electrochem. 2022. V. 28. 2219002.https://doi.org/10.13208/j.electrochem.2219002
  15. Verissimo N.V., Vicente F.A., de Oliveira R.C. et al. // Biotechnology Advances. 2022. V. 61. 108055.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2022.108055
  16. Lu B., Liu T., Wanga H. et al. // J. Mol. Liq. 2022. V. 351. 118643.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2022.118643
  17. Ali K., Moshikur R., Goto M. et al. // Pharmaceutical Research. 2022. V. 39. P. 2335.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11095-022-03322-x
  18. Kamimura A., Kawamoto T., Fujii K. // Chem. Rec. 2023. e202200269.https://doi.org/10.1002/tcr.202200269
  19. Kadokawa J. // Mater. Adv. 2022. V. 3. P. 3355.https://doi.org/10.1039/d2ma00101b
  20. Ben Salah H., Nancarrow P., Al-Othman A. // Fuel. 2021. V. 302. 121195.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2021.121195
  21. Lal B., Qasim A., Shariff A. M. Ionic Liquids Usage in Oil and Gas Industry. Chapter in book: Ionic Liquids in Flow Assurance. Springer Briefs in Petroleum Geoscience & Engineering. Springer, Cham. 2021. 71 p.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63753-8_1
  22. Dong H., Wu Z., Li X., Guo X. et al. // Energy Fuels. 2022. V. 36. P. 6831.https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.2c01021
  23. Kharazi M., Saien J., Asadabadi S. // Topics in Current Chemistry. 2022. V. 380. 5.https://doi.org/10.1007/s41061-021-00362-6
  24. Zhang R., Ke Q., Zhang Z. et al. // Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022. V. 23. 11401.https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms231911401
  25. Zhao H., Baker G.A. // Green Chemistry Letters and Reviews. 2023. V. 16. 2149280.https://doi.org/10.1080/17518253.2022.2149280
  26. Mishra D.K., Hussain R., Pugazhenthi G. et al. // ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. 2022. V. 10. P. 6157.https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.2c00561
  27. Bilgiç G. Investigation of Boron-Based Ionic Liquids for Energy Applications. Chapter in book: Characteristics and Applications of Boron. 2022. 26 p. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.105970
  28. Paduszynski K., Kłebowski K., Krolikowska M. // J. Mol. Liq. 2021. V. 344. 117631.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2021.117631
  29. Rehman A., Zaini D.B., Lal B. // Process Safety Progress. 2022. V. 41. P. S141.https://doi.org/10.1002/prs.12349
  30. Bodo E. // J. Phys. Chem. B. 2022. V. 126. P. 3.https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcb.1c09476
  31. Ionic Liquid Market Size − Global Industry, Share, Analysis, Trends and Forecast 2022–2030 (https://www.acumenresearchandconsulting.com/ionic-liquid-market)
  32. Bender C.R., Kuhn B.L., Farias C.A.A. et al. // J. Braz. Chem. Soc. 2019. V. 30. P. 2199.https://doi.org/10.21577/0103-5053.20190114
  33. Xu C., Cheng Z. // Processes. 2021. V. 9. P. 337.https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9020337
  34. Chakraborty M., Barik S., Mahapatra A. et al. // J. Phys. Chem. B. 2021. V. 125. P. 13015.https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcb.1c07442
  35. Cai S., Tao C., Yao T. et al. // Pet. PetroChem. Eng. J. 2021. V. 5. 00028.https://doi.org/10.23880/ppej-16000288
  36. Chen Y., Han X., Liu Z. et al. // J. Mol. Liq. 2022. V. 366. 120336.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2022.120336
  37. Lovelock K.R.J., Deyko A., Corfield J.-A. et al. // ChemPhysChem. 2009. V. 10. P. 337.https://doi.org/10.1002/cphc.200800690
  38. Montalbana M.G., Vílloraa G., Licence P. // Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety. 2018. V. 150. P. 129.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2017.11.073
  39. Shirota H., Mandai T., Fukazawa H. et al. // J. Chem. Eng. Data. 2011. V. 56. P. 2453.https://doi.org/10.1021/je2000183
  40. Majhi D., Seth S., Sarkar M. // Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2018. V. 20. 7844.https://doi.org/10.1039/c7cp08630j
  41. Cao Y., Mu T. // Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2014. V. 53. P. 8651.https://doi.org/10.1021/ie5009597
  42. Haddad B., Kiefer J., Brahim H. et al. // Appl. Sci. 2018. V. 8. 1043.https://doi.org/10.3390/app8071043
  43. Jin C., Ye C., Phillips B.S. et al. // J. Mater. Chem. 2006. V. 16. P. 1529.https://doi.org/10.1039/B517888F
  44. Красовский В.Г., Капустин Г.И., Глухов Л.М. др. // Журн. физ. химии. 2022. Т. 96. С. 1031.https://doi.org/10.1134/S0036024422070172
  45. Lowe J.P. Barriers to Internal Rotation about Single Bonds. Chapter in book: Progress in Physical Organic Chemistry. V. 6 (P. 1.) Edited by A. Streitwieser, Jr. R. W. Taft. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 1968.https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470171851.ch1
  46. Масимов Э.А., Пашаев Б.Г., Гасанов Г.Ш. и др. // Журн. физ. химии. 2019. Т. 93. С. 845.https://doi.org/10.1134/S0036024419060207
  47. Flory P.J. Statistical Mechanics of Chain Molecules, Wiley: New York 1969, 432 p. (ISBN 0-470-26495-0); reissued 1989 (ISBN 1-56990-019-1)
  48. Everaers R., Karimi-Varzaneh H.A., Fleck F. et al. // Macromolecules. 2020. V. 53. P. 1901.https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.macromol.9b02428
  49. Solution Chemistry Research Progress. Ed. D.V. Bostrelli, New York: Nova Science, 2011. 187 p.
  50. Huang H.-C., Yen Y.-C., Chang J.-C. et al. // J. Mater. Chem. A. 2016. V. 4. P. 19160.https://doi.org/10.1039/C6TA08203C
  51. Zhang L., Zhang Z., Sun Y. et al. // Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2013. V. 52. P. 16335.https://doi.org/10.1021/ie4022682
  52. Mei X., Yue Z., Ma Q. et al. // J. Mol. Liq. 2018. V. 272. P. 1001.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2018.10.085
  53. Web Site Wired Chemist (https://www.wiredchemist.com/chemistry/data/bond_energies_lengths.html)
  54. University of Texas. General Chemistry. Data and Tables. (https://gchem.cm.utexas.edu/data/section2.php?target=bond-energies-table4.php)
  55. Красовский В.Г., Черникова Е.А., Глухов Л.М. и др. // Журн. физ. химии. 2018. Т. 92. С. 1851.
  56. Красовский В.Г., Черникова Е.А., Глухов Л.М. и др. // Изв. Академии наук. Сер. Хим. 2018. Т. 67. С. 1621.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11172-018-2268-3
  57. Krasovskiy V.G., Kapustin G.I., Gorbatsevich O.B. et al. // Molecules. 2020. V. 25. 2949.https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25122949

Supplementary files


Copyright (c) 2023 В.Г. Красовский, Г.И. Капустин, Л.М. Глухов, Е.А. Черникова, Л.М. Кустов